Site Speed

Why Core Web Vitals Still Matter

Every year someone declares Core Web Vitals dead as a ranking factor, and every year I keep finding the same pattern: the fast page keeps the visitor, and the visitor who stays is the one who converts. Speed doesn't need to be a confirmed heavy ranking signal to be worth fixing: it's a business problem wearing an SEO badge.

The three that matter

Largest Contentful Paint measures how quickly the main content appears. Interaction to Next Paint measures how responsive the page feels once someone starts clicking. Cumulative Layout Shift measures whether things jump around while loading: the classic case of tapping a button just as an ad loads above it.

Where sites actually lose points

In practice it's rarely one dramatic problem. It's an unoptimized hero image, a render-blocking font file, three analytics scripts loading before the content, and a carousel plugin nobody remembers installing. Each one costs a little; together they cost the page its ranking and its visitors.

What I check first

  • Image sizes and formats: most sites are still serving heavy files where a modern format would do
  • Render-blocking CSS and JavaScript above the fold
  • Third-party scripts (chat widgets, ad tags, old plugins) loaded on every page whether they're needed or not
  • Font loading strategy, since an un-swapped custom font is a common cause of layout shift

None of this is glamorous work, which is exactly why it's usually still there to fix. If your site feels slow to you on a good connection, it's worse for a visitor on an average mobile connection.